Thunderbolts* Post Credit Scene: Who REALLY Owns the ‘Avengers’ Name?

Enough time has passed—it’s time to talk about the Thunderbolts post-credit scene. Bucky and Sam clash over who really gets to keep the name Avengers. So who’s right? Let’s break it down.

Thunderbolts’ post credit scene shows that Bucky and Sam are having a dispute over the ‘Avengers’ name

Captain Marvel: The Origin of the Name

Carol Danvers used that name when she joined the Air Force 

The word Avenger first belonged to Carol Danvers, whose call sign as a U.S. Air Force pilot was “Avenger.” Inspired by her, Nick Fury proposed The Avengers Initiative to the World Security Council after his encounter with her.

SHIELD: The First Avengers

SHIELD was the first organization that assembled the Avengers

It was SHIELD that officially assembled the Avengers to stop Loki’s Chitauri invasion. At that point, the name belonged to the organization that brought Earth’s Mightiest Heroes together.

Stark Industries: Ownership Through Funding

Tony Stark fully funded the team after SHIELD collapsed 

After SHIELD collapsed during Captain America: The Winter Soldier, Tony Stark stepped in. He not only funded the Avengers but also provided their facilities and tech. With Stark’s wealth and lawyers, it’s safe to assume Stark Industries legally trademarked the Avengers name at some point.

Valentina de Fontaine: The Current Holder?

Valentina bought the Avengers Towers after the team fell apart 

But things got messy after Civil War. The Avengers fell apart, Stark sold Avengers Tower, and that building eventually landed in the hands of Valentina de Fontaine—the same woman now funding the so-called “New Avengers,” the team Bucky joins.

If facilities and funding decide ownership, then Bucky might technically be right—Valentina has the resources and infrastructure.

Maybe It’s Not About the Name

Maybe Sam doesn’t really care about the name

Legally, the New Avengers backed by Valentina and the government probably can use the Avengers name. But Sam’s argument isn’t really about legality—it’s about morality.

Valentina still needs to face justice 

Valentina is not a hero. Before creating Sentry, she ran human experiments that killed countless people, then covered it up with mercenaries. Bucky spent most of Thunderbolts trying to bring her to justice. Yet when Valentina branded his team the “New Avengers,” he let it slide.

That’s the real conflict:

  • Sam wants Valentina exposed and punished.
  • Bucky compromises, accepting her corruption for the sake of keeping the Avengers legacy alive.

Final Word

Let’s just hope this duo would make up in Avengers: Doomsday 

So, who owns the Avengers name? Legally—probably Valentina. Spiritually—no one but the heroes who built it.

And that’s exactly why the argument between Bucky and Sam matters. It isn’t about paperwork or trademarks. It’s about whether the Avengers name should stand for justice—or be twisted into a tool for someone else’s power.

Author

  • Muzhameer Putra

    Student by day, writer by night. If it's cinematic, I'll get it right.

    I'm a big fan of superheroes, cinemas, science, and history. But most of all, I just love good stories.

    View all posts

By Muzhameer Putra

Student by day, writer by night. If it's cinematic, I'll get it right. I'm a big fan of superheroes, cinemas, science, and history. But most of all, I just love good stories.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *